The Wince Of Parties: MGMT’s Sophomore Slump

We're all for artistic freedom, says Julian Marszalek, but what happens when it leads a band straight off a cliff edge?

Make your own mind up about the MGMT album by clicking here.

If anything has come to characterise the wait for Congratulations, the second album from Brooklynโ€™s psych-pop purveyors MGMT, then itโ€™s the sense of heightened anticipation that precedes its arrival. How could it not? Their debut, Oracular Spectacular, was one of those once-in-a-generation albums that seemed to appear as if from nowhere before snowballing to the grand status of A Very Important Album indeed.

Oracular Spectacular stood out from the pack and it certainly distanced itself from any number of painfully studied Brooklyn hipsters, flipsters and other finger poppinโ€™ daddies. MGMTโ€™s nearest kindred spirits were neighbours and one-time touring partners Yeasayer and both bands gleefully tapped into an aesthetic that blended psychedelic flashes with a pop sensibility. Yeasayer aesthetically outflanked the Ivy League Afroisms of Vampire Weekend with a fierce sense of independence. At the same time MGMT separated themselves from everyone thanks to a mix of knowing winks, a sense of humour and an intimate relationship with the concept of melody and the sheer joy that it can bring.

Their initial live shows were hesitant, almost nervous affairs. Opening for Band Of Horses and Sons & Daughters at Koko during the opening overs of 2008, MGMT looked more than a little scared. Their fragile pop barely held together as nerves seemed to get the better of them. Yet, as their gigs grew in number, so their stage craft began to flourish. By the time they reached Glastonburyโ€™s Park Stage that summer, their swagger matched their infectious pop hooks and they ended up storming the Reading Festivalโ€™s Radio 1 tent. The eruption that met โ€˜Time To Pretendโ€™ was a genuine outpouring of pent-up emotion from a crowd hungry to party and the 21st century floor-filling classic that is โ€˜Kidsโ€™ simply detonated what was an already combustible environment.

This was pop the way that it should be โ€“ high on tunes and fuelled by the same sense of sonic creativity that drove the likes of Brian Wilson, Giorgio Moroder, Kraftwerk and, latterly, James Murphy. Of course youโ€™re going to be bursting at the seams to check out Congratulations. You can just feel the anticipation.

And then the word filtered through that none other than Pete Kember โ€“ aka Spacemen 3โ€™s cosmic commander-in-chief โ€“ was to assume the mantle of producer. For all his reputation for psychedelic exploration and the limitless possibilities of repetition and trance-like mantras, Kember is a man with a strong pop sensibility. Witness his appropriation of Evie Sandsโ€™ Northern Soul classic, โ€˜Canโ€™t Let Goโ€™, for Spectrumโ€™s ‘How You Satisfy Me’ or the acid house pulse of Spacemen 3โ€™s โ€˜Big City (Everybody I Know Can Be Found Here)โ€™.

A combination made in heaven? It certainly felt like it had the potential to be and one that adds to the nagging sense of anticipation thatโ€™s soon going to give way to a crushing feeling of disappointment because, sad to report, Congratulations has the potential to be the yearโ€™s biggest stinker.

This is the album that will have major record labels emitting hollow and cynical laughter every time the concept of โ€œartistic freedomโ€ is mentioned with regards one of their charges in the near future because what we have here is a collection of songs totally lacking in what us made fall in love with MGMT in the first place.

The humour of its predecessor has been replaced with knowing smirks (check the mangled horror of โ€˜Brian Enoโ€™) and misplaced emphasis on what constitutes psychedelic experimentation. โ€˜Song For Dan Treacyโ€™ manages the genuinely upsetting feat of emulating the Television Personalities at their most garbled and tuneless and the result is something that even the opiated horror of Babyshambles would consider dumping. Elsewhere, and with no hint of irony, youโ€™ll find โ€˜Flash Deliriumโ€™, a song that comes out like the twisted, disowned sibling of Flight Of The Conchordsโ€™ mannered 60s LSD spoof, โ€˜The Prince Of Partiesโ€™. But whatโ€™s happened here is MGMTโ€™s total estrangement with melody, hooks and the notion that music can still be fun while offering a challenging perspective.

MGMT are at least to be congratulated for delivering this album with a straight face to their doubtlessly perplexed label but itโ€™s difficult not to imagine the sense of panic that must have greeted it. Repeated requests to the bandโ€™s label for advanced copies of Congratulations were met with a volley of excuses ranging from outright stonewalling to some nonsense or other about the lack of human resources available to put a watermarked copy together. (In their defence, Columbia did at least offer a playback at their offices but those circumstances were of use to neither man nor beast; an artificial environment not conducive to the listening experience.)

Itโ€™s only the resourcefulness of The Quietus that secures a copy of the album well in advance of our meeting with MGMT but repeated and continual plays refuse to yield any of the factors and graces that charmed us in the first place. For sure, MGMT have taken a bold move to extricate themselves from the perception of being a bunch of happy clappy, faux hippies but the price that theyโ€™ve paid in the name of โ€˜experimentationโ€™ has been way too high.

And right now, as The Quietus โ€“ one of only two websites to be granted an audience with the band – takes a seat in the 10th floor suite of an upmarket hotel in Kensington, the problem is how to broach the subject that this album just isnโ€™t much cop? The decision is made to gently find out why MGMT didnโ€™t make their much-rumoured appearance at the previous nightโ€™s Spectrum gig at the Luminaire in north west London. A fall out with Kember perhaps?

โ€œIt was a mis-communication or something,โ€ offers guitarist James Richardson as we await the arrival of Ben Goldwasser. โ€œWe just thought that we were going to go and hang out. Iโ€™m not really sure how it all came about but I hope that Pete [Kember] isnโ€™t mad at us, โ€˜cos we wouldnโ€™t want to, yโ€™knowโ€ฆโ€

His voice trails off before adding: โ€œWe love Pete.โ€

Ah yes, Pete Kember. As producer, what exactly has been his role in all of this? Speaking recently to producer Tony Visconti, this writer was told that the job of the producer was not unlike that of a film director. In other words, itโ€™s the producer who sees the grand vision and does what he has to to make sure that that vision is realised.

So what was his imput?

โ€œHeโ€™s creating a vibe, I guess, and yโ€™know, I donโ€™t think he ever said anything like, โ€˜Youโ€™re doing this wrongโ€™ or โ€˜You need to put this part hereโ€™ and stuff like that,โ€ says James.

โ€œIt was kinda nice to have someone else there who, yโ€™know, kinda keeps you on track. Yeah, the whole thing was really surreal and bizarre, yโ€™know?โ€

Keep things on track? The mind races to imagine what things would have turned out like off track but thereโ€™s little time to consider this as the colourful figure of Ben goldwasser enters the room. With his tightly fitting grey jacket, green trousers, striped socks and Buddy Holly glasses, Goldwasser cuts a delightfully eccentric yet colourfully intriguing figure.

โ€œHave we met before?โ€ he says, offering his hand.

I donโ€™t think so, replies The Quietus. We were just talking about last night.

โ€œLast night?โ€

Yeah, the Spectrum gig. There were rumours flying around that you were supposed to be playing.

โ€œYeah,โ€ replies Ben somewhat hesitantly. โ€œUhโ€ฆyeah, probably. But we were too busy to go to the show last night.โ€

Thereโ€™s a long pause as Goldwasser considers his words.

โ€œYeah, we had a really long day in Maida Vale doing a session and we did about five songs. Then we went to the rehearsal studio for a little photo shoot and a rehearsal.โ€

Letโ€™s talk about the new album. Youโ€™ve managed to avoid the usual second album syndrome by not complaining about the music biz too much. Are you happy with your lot then?

โ€œI think we could complain more but we just choose to focus on positive things but yeah, I think we realised that it would easy to fall into that trap of like, writing an album of, โ€˜Oh man, weโ€™re like semi famous! What do we do now? Itโ€™s terrible!โ€™โ€ he begins.

โ€œI mean, some of the stuff on the album deals with fame and attention but overall the albumโ€™s about us having fun and making music that we really like and that weโ€™ll enjoy playing live for the next year.โ€

Time for some diplomacy.

Itโ€™s a marked departure from the first album.

โ€œYeah. It makes sense that weโ€™re going in that direction considering some of the songs that were written later for the last album and โ€˜Metanoiaโ€™ which we recorded between the last album and this one and that was heading in that kind of weird and eclectic psychedelic direction.โ€

What prompted that move into psychedelia?

โ€œItโ€™s all we listen to,โ€ replies Ben. โ€œWe donโ€™t really listen to a lot of like, radio-friendly pop music. I mean, we appreciate and love it but itโ€™s not really what we listen to most of the time.โ€

So what sort of psychedelic stuff has been blowing your mind?

โ€œI dunnoโ€ฆ the Television Personalities, the Beach Boys, Royal Trux and some Electric Prunesโ€ฆโ€

Largely good choices.

Itโ€™s interesting what Ben has to say about radio-friendly pop music but surely he must realise that a lot of this psychedelic stuff is pop? The Beach Boys were regularly storming the charts and even the Electric Prunes had hits with stuff like โ€˜I Had Too Much To Dream Last Nightโ€™.

Are MGMT trying to shy away from having hits or is that something that doesnโ€™t motivate you?

โ€œI think we just want to make pop music thatโ€™s interesting,โ€ counters Ben.

โ€œPeople only have a sense of what pop music means from like, the last five years. Pop music, over the history of pop music, is a lot of different things. I think the new album is pop music but itโ€™s not pop music like youโ€™ve been used to hearing over the last five years.โ€

Itโ€™s difficult to argue with that but then it remains difficult to view Congratulations as any form of pop music.

So, is MGMT still interested in reaching out to a wider audience then? Are they trying to subvert the form? Is that it?

โ€œYeah, I mean we hope that we can turn some people on to some different kind of music. Weโ€™re not trying to be exclusive and only cater to elitist record snobs or something like that but people who came to the last album from hearing our songs on the radio but who donโ€™t know who Television Personalities are. We want everybody to try something new,โ€ says Ben.

Ah, yesโ€ฆTelevision Personalities. You big-up Dan Treacy from the group on the album but youโ€™ve got a downer on Brian Eno. Shouldnโ€™t that be the other way round?

โ€œWe mean โ€˜Brian Enoโ€™ to be very positive. I mean, weโ€™re kinda poking fun,โ€ responds Ben in protest.

James springs into action: โ€œItโ€™s just a funny song, you know? Itโ€™s not supposed to be a diss.โ€

Ben offers an explanation: โ€œItโ€™s about how Brian Eno is seen as an untouchable kind of uber-genius producer andโ€ฆโ€

But he is.

โ€œYeah, but his image in the public eye is really ridiculous,โ€ counters Ben.

โ€œIf you read the lyrics they all really make sense. Itโ€™s about like, [vocalist] Andrew [VanWyngarden], like, you know, travelling through Pennsylvania and finding, like, uhโ€ฆ hearing like really weird music in a cathedral and finding out itโ€™s like Brian Eno playing the organ or something. Itโ€™s like a weird dream or something.โ€

Rightโ€ฆ

Arenโ€™t there more worthy targets to have a go at than Brian Eno?

โ€œI donโ€™t think weโ€™re looking for targets. I think we wanna celebrate Brian Eno more than anything and heโ€™s done so much amazing stuff,โ€ replies Ben.

โ€œItโ€™s like โ€˜Lady Dadaโ€™s Nightmareโ€™ โ€“ itโ€™s much more about the music than the title which is like a silly thing that we added later. Itโ€™s not meant as a jab or a negative comment or anything like that. We just talk about Lady Gaga because she exists in such a different world from us and to be even mentioned in the same breath is like, โ€œWow! Lady Gaga!โ€ Sheโ€™s, like, from another planet compared to us.โ€

Letโ€™s talk about โ€˜Flash Deliriumโ€™, the free download and taster for Congratulations. How did you feel about the reactions to it? It got a mixed response over here.

โ€œWeโ€™re really proud of the track and it is really weird and we were admitting that we think itโ€™s a weird song and weโ€™re fully aware of what kind of music it is and we think that itโ€™s really good music,โ€ replies Ben.

โ€œWe hope that people are open minded enough to accept a song like that. And weโ€™re really glad thatโ€™s it been played on the radio and music like that rarely gets played on Radio 1; itโ€™s pretty creepy.โ€

It sure is.

_You can listen to Flash Delirium here…

But is it as good as ‘Prince Of Parties by Flight Of The Conchords…

Are you being wilfully perverse?

โ€œNo. I mean, what do you do after an album like Oracular Spectacular with all these hits on it? What can you do other than make a record that you would want to hear? What else are you supposed to do?โ€ asks James, missing the point that more top tunes wouldnโ€™t go amiss.

Ben expands: โ€œThe only way forward is to say, โ€˜Well, OK, if I bought a record, what would I want it to sound like and letโ€™s try to do that.โ€™ So thatโ€™s what we did.

โ€œWeโ€™d already written โ€˜Time To Pretendโ€™, โ€˜Kidsโ€™ and โ€˜Electric Feelโ€™ when we started working on Oracular Spectacular and I think most of the music on that album was, in a way, a response to that, to the music that weโ€™d already written. So itโ€™s like, โ€˜OK, we have these pop songs that we wrote when we were still in college and having fun in innocent times and now weโ€™re in the real world and itโ€™s scary and we donโ€™t understand whatโ€™s going onโ€™ and so we wrote these kind of weird, alienated songs as a response.

โ€œWith this album weโ€™re not responding to any of that stuff even though the lyrics are kind of about fame and success. We donโ€™t wanna stand on a soapbox and tell people, โ€˜This is what we believeโ€™โ€

Sensitive readers are now warned of the clichรฉ alert:

โ€œWe just wanna make music we like and we hope that other people find that music and like it.

You were warned.

โ€œBut itโ€™s interesting to see the reaction and see how much people get offended by music.โ€

The apparent secrecy surrounding Congratulations suggested that perhaps youโ€™d found a cure for cancer but itโ€™s not as immediate as its predecessor, is it? Is that a deliberate move?

โ€œNo, not really. Itโ€™s just how we think about music these days,โ€ says Ben.

โ€œMost of the music that we like the most, thereโ€™s something drawing you in but at the same time thereโ€™s something putting you off. And you think, โ€˜Woah! This would go down easier if it wasnโ€™t for this partโ€™ and then you start to realise that the more challenging stuff is, itโ€™s like ying and yang or something.โ€

James analysis is more succinct: โ€œItโ€™s a shitty bit in an oyster that becomes a pearl.โ€

Quite.

So youโ€™re saying that youโ€™re hoping that this album will open up?

โ€œHopefully, yeah. I think we all wanted it to be the kind of album that you donโ€™t get the first time, that you listen to over and over again and it grows on you.โ€

James expands on the theme: โ€œYeah, for me, it was like the Pixiesโ€™ Surfer Rosa. When I first heard that I was in, like, the sixth grade and I thought it sucked. I thought the production was, like, awful and they couldnโ€™t play their instruments, you know? I used to like Led Zeppelin and it kind of blew my mind.

โ€œAt first I thought it was terrible music, just awful and it became, like, you know, over time it kinda stuck in my head because it was so weird and different and it changed the way I thought about things so much that it became a part of my life.

โ€œNot that Iโ€™m comparing us to Surfer Rosa but thatโ€™s sorta what weโ€™ve gone for, I think.โ€

Are you making your audience work then?

โ€œYeah,โ€ replies Ben.

But here comes the caveat: โ€œI mean, I think thatโ€™s the kind of audience that we want โ€“ a critical audience.

โ€œIโ€™m sure we have some fair weather fans whoโ€™ll say, โ€˜Well, there are no songs that on here like the ones that I really, really liked on the last album and Iโ€™m not going to give this album a chance.โ€™ But Iโ€™m sure there are also people who are more into the stranger songs on Oracular Spectacular who are going to love this album.

โ€œAnd maybe the people who never gave us a chance because all they thought of us was that we were a derivative pop band because of what they heard of the last album and now theyโ€™ll realise that we have this crazy, psychedelic side. I dunno, who knows?โ€

But surely that โ€œcrazy, psychedelicโ€ side was apparent at the beginning, wasnโ€™t it?

โ€œWe would argue, โ€˜Yesโ€™ but I think that because we were kind of painted as an indie-electro band after the last album, it was, like, people have to spin that into the story somehow. Like, it was a total 180 degree shift but for us it was like, that was a blip on the radar.

โ€œAnd itโ€™s also like the definition of psychedelia; thereโ€™s a difference between what we consider psychedelic music and you know, like wearing your headband and being on a beach and stuff. You know what I mean?โ€

What? Like the look you had on the last album?

โ€œA lot of people latched on to the last album as being psychedelic but not for musical reasons but like, for, โ€˜Ooh look! Theyโ€™ve got face paint on!โ€™ I think a lot of the last album was poking fun at this image of what you already saw with that image of a pair of hippies and stuff and that and we were definitely joking about that. I mean, the โ€˜Time to Pretendโ€™ video was kind of a satire and I think that some people really donโ€™t get that.โ€

So with this album youโ€™re trying to draw a line in the sand then?

โ€œI think weโ€™re trying not to be satirical for the most part or ironic or something. I think itโ€™s as honest as possible. I think that some bands are so caught up in irony that itโ€™s, like, they donโ€™t ever have to be serious because at any moment, like, they could do something and then be, like, โ€˜Oh, we didnโ€™t really mean that!โ€™ โ€˜cos they were joking around and we donโ€™t want ourselves to be one of those bands.โ€

Errrโ€ฆ

โ€œWe want to be honest and we want people to know exactly where weโ€™re coming from and weโ€™re not trying to hide behind obscurity or something.โ€

Given Sonic Boomโ€™s background and his personal tastes and also Dan Treacy, can we expect a collaboration with Pete Doherty at some stage?

Ben says: โ€œUmmmโ€ฆ I guess it probably wouldnโ€™t surprise people would it? I wouldnโ€™t expect that to happen. I donโ€™t see it in the near future but I guessโ€ฆ Oh, is this because of past records of heroin use?โ€

Yeah.

He continues: โ€œI dunno. The NME article must be out and theyโ€™ve realised that weโ€™ve listened to a lot of music thatโ€™s made by people who have some point in their lives done a lot of heroin. I donโ€™t know what it is about heroin."

To be fair, Congratulations is not a terrible album and many, doubtlessly surrender to its reedy charms. The album will probably even struggle into the lower reaches of the end of year lists. But as we attempt a fifth and sixth listen to this missed opportunity – this exercise in laziness – very little of it remains in the memory bar the bass line to ‘Brian Eno’, the few flashes of actual psychedelic deviance that crop up on ‘Lady Dada’s Nightmare and the ominous phrase that opens the title track: "Dead in the water."


Donโ€™t Miss The Quietus Digest

Start each weekend with our free email newsletter.

Help tQ Survive & Thrive

Without our subscribers, all this would simply fall into the cultural abyss. Please take a moment to explore our membership tiers and rewards + donโ€™t miss our free 30-day trial offer for new subs.

Try For Free