In the Absolutely Fabulous episode โJealousโ, Naomi Campbell plays herself in an episode revolving around an award show. A recurring joke throughout the episode sees Campbell asked if she is okay for water? Did she like the flowers sent to her? Does she need anything? Whenever she says she is fine, thanks, the characters respond with a stage whisper, โSheโs very difficult you know!โ, even though it is abundantly clear she isnโt.
The 90s were a strange time, it must be said, and Absolutely Fabulous, Naomi Campbell and Radiohead all have cultural recognition today from their early years in the way that The Brittas Empire, Menswe@r and Amber Valetta perhaps donโt.
For Radiohead, they were mostly going steady until their 1997 album OK Computer. You may have heard of it. Amongst a number of slightly more grounded accolades, it was heralded by the readers of Q Magazine as the best album of all time, less than a year after it was released.
OF.
ALL.
TIME.
Rumours of people โdifficult to work withโ (like Campbell) often result from backstage gossip and hardened professional support staff, not so much the public perception. In Radioheadโs case, however, we donโt have to imagine it – we can see it for ourselves.
Released a year and a half after OK Computer, the film Meeting People Is Easy captures the band on tour promoting that album. Whilst the band donโt appear difficult, they do seem to be quite jaded and tired from all the touring. Caught in the endless promo machine, you witness them in repetitive tranches of activity, all designed to furtherโฆ their art? The album? Their air miles? It seems to have got confused, somewhere, along the various lines, what all of it is for.
They keep tubbing things up theyโre reading out for award shows. They get a bit snipey with each other, very briefly. Theyโre playing Berlin but havenโt seen any of the city.
However itโs not all doom and gloom: quite often theyโre having actual fun, seeming to enjoy themselves playing songs that sound and look great, or Colin Greenwood is speaking French to interviewers whilst other band members look on, impressed and amused.
Perhaps the most telling scene in the documentary is where Yorke deconstructs their work in some kind of generic corporate backstage laminated chair area:
โWell, Jonny, last year we were the most hyped band, we were number 1 in all the pollsโฆ and it’s bollocks, man, its bollocksโฆโ
โItโs a headfuckโฆ itโs a complete headfuck.โ
โโฆrunning too long on bravado, believe how wonderful everyone tells us we areโฆโ
In order to unheadfuck themselves after the tour would probably require continuing this kind of soul searching. Pressure, real and imagined, from fans, label and media probably didnโt help: how, exactly, could the album after OK Computer ever follow this touchstone โcorrectlyโ? Rather than sonically bunker down (with an eponymous titled album perhaps) they opened things up. Around the time the successor, Kid A, came out the band made reference to the electronic music, krautrock, jazz and modern classical they had been listening to in the few interviews they gave around this time. Not that this was new to the band – they had played Messiaen before OK Computer-era concerts, and Yorke bought second copies of the WARP Records catalogue to add to his well-worn originals.
Indeed, the modern WARP Records label of this time seems to be a good signpost to the album. For all the moments on Kid A, that reference LFO, Autechre and Aphex Twin there is an equal amount that references the label’s โpost-electronicaโ years, meaning bands such as Broadcast: I can picture the much-missed Trish Keenan singing the โIโm lost at sea, donโt follow meโ line from โIn Limboโ perfectly.
Kid A, starts with โEverything In Itโs Right Placeโ, warm organ tones being added to with vocal cut ups, reverses and gentle use of effects. Yorkeโs vocal proper kicks in around the 35 second mark, coalescing around the phrase, โYesterday I woke up sucking a lemonโ (which Iโd like to think is a cheeky advance riposte to the kind of reaction the album might get, but probably isnโt). Later on Yorke is singing with his own vocal in the backing, creating a dense Yorke vocal choir in the established Enya house style.
The track gives way to the title track, a more minimal, melancholy and electronic affair. There are vocals here, but they are unintelligible, distorted – but also retaining some melody. If you wanted OK Computer 2, this is the first indication youโre not going to get it.
The rest of the tracks veer between electronics-heavy and more familiar guitar-grounded tracks. Indeed, โThe National Anthemโ and โOptimisticโ sound like the guitar hits you might expect from guitar hits outfit Radiohead. โThe National Anthemโ starts with a discreet scree of electronic radar noise but goes straight into heavy riffing, bright yet murky percussion, with Yorkeโs slightly saturated vocals coming in before an all-out horn-out.
โOptimisticโ you could imagine on The Bends, or OK Computer, but the atmospheres and ambiences of the recording confirm it is not an outtake given a new home. The same applies to โIn Limboโ perhaps the most conventional sounding of the tracks on here.
These tracks are contrasted utterly by โIdiotequeโ. Even twenty years after I first heard it, it still doesnโt sound like anything else Iโve ever heard. The sound of the lads from the WDR lab popping down to Berghain for some lager lager lager? Well, perhaps, but โIdiotequeโ certainly features sounds from the electroacoustic studio. Based on a sample of electronic pioneer Paul Lansky, the track adds Max MSP-style digital shards, Apollo programme-kick drum and the most urgent vocal on this record. The band, as you knew them, donโt appear to play on this. No guitar. No bass. No rock. No roll. If I was to identify one track that alienated some of the bandโs existing audience, it would be this.
Itโs not all unpalatable electronic weirdness, however. โHow To Disappear Completelyโ and โMotion Picture Soundtrackโ seem to be cut from the same piece of more traditional cloth. Indeed, โMotion Picture Soundtrackโ directly links back, in title at least, to โExit Music (For A Film)โ from OK Computer. Iโd suggest the two tracks here are more subtle, lacking that trackโs doom synth, field recording chatter and propulsive percussive ending. โHow To Disappear Completelyโ starts with acoustic guitar and ends with strings, whilst โMotion Picture Soundtrackโ starts with the drone and pedal noise of a harmonium, and ends with choir and harp. Then, after a minute of silence, 60 seconds of chirpy Main-style tones before it falls into silence for good.
โTreefingersโ is a track that features no vocals at all, just overlapping washes of ambient tones, rising and falling for almost four minutes, and wouldnโt sit badly on one of Enoโs Ambient series or Rafael Toralโs early albums. โMorning Bellโ is a post-rock track, light on the electronics but still recognisably different from anything 93-97.
All in, then, ten tracks clocking in at just under 50 minutes.
Hardly Morton Feldmanโs six hour String Quartet No. 2.
And yetโฆ
The reaction to the album wasโฆ mixed, frankly. A young website called Pitchfork awarded it the hallowed 10.0 rating. Simon Reynolds in Uncut called the album โa shining example and stinging reproach to the rest of the Britrock packโ. Less favourable was Mark Beaumont at NME who said Radiohead were "simply ploughing furrows dug by DJ Shadow and Brian Eno before themโ (which to this writer is a much more interesting prospect than all the hundreds of derivative Beatles and Kinks furrow ploughers to be usually found in NME). Jim Irvin in Mojo declared it, among other things, โjust awfulโ, which made me howl with laughter when researching this article. Various views at and between these two extremes were dispatched, filed and aired.
For me, ultimately all the criticism comes back to one question: are you listening to the music, or are you listening to the music and comparing it to OK Computer?
To put it another way: why ask an opera critic to attend and review a rave?
There are, of course, some opera critics who might well be up for it, but an opera critic ultimately having a tantrum that, ‘This isnโt opera!’ is of limited value. It demonstrates a lack of engagement with the material to bitterly tithing about how itโs โindulgentโ. (And how many times could that be said about rock music, guitar solos and general rock star wankerdom?)
Part of the mixed reaction to Kid A also touches on something less about the band and the record, and more about rockism: the desire to venerate rock music as highest in the pecking order, with โlesserโ genres such as electronic and dance being added to the metaphorical Disco Sucks bonfire.
The fusing of electronics into existing forms, or even – clutches pearls – on itโs own, seem to have to aroused a certain rowdy ire, in the UK. The work of Stockhausen, for example, was trod in by Sir Thomas Beecham, rather than heard. LFO, with their seminal ‘LFO’ single, were famously taken off the air halfway through, and described by Radio 1 DJ Steve Wright as โthe worst record everโ (high praise indeed from a person who made prank calling a career). Marc Almond, during his Soft Cell years, was cruelly lampooned on Not The Nine OโClock News as only speaking via a pre-recorded vocal track (and if youโve seen Almond sing as many times as I have, you know he doesnโt need any help). For Radiohead to do more than dabble in electronics was perhaps always destined for choppy waters, no matter how earnest the rationale behind it.
Iโd suggest Kid A, as a whole, is familiar as Radiohead. For all the manipulated vocals and electronics, there are acoustic and electric guitars, and โproperโ vocals. The album continues their path of consolidation of what they were known for, adding new sonic flavours with each album. The Bends took the guitars from Pablo Honey and added different moods and paces, most notably in โStreet Spiritโ and โFake Plastic Treesโ. OK Computer started with sleigh bells, no less, alongside the guitar riffing. It featured other sonic curios such as the seven minute three act โParanoid Androidโ, the analogue collapse at the conclusion of โKarma Policeโ, the field recording and ripe synth of โExit Music (For A Film)โ and the robot doom chanson of โFitter Happierโ. It was perhaps ‘Climbing Up The Walls’ – featuring Sonic Youth-style feedback, sub-aqua drumming and outright screaming – that gave a clue of where the band were going to go with Kid A, even before theyโve realised it themselves. This is rock music, but not rock music that is going to end up on a Mondeo ad.
The trajectory Radiohead hurtled along has previous form: Talking Heads did something similar, particularly with their album Remain In Light, itself frequently a nominee for Best Album Ever. That the band could have worked on their own deconstruction of their perky guitar sound was evident – just listen to โDrugsโ from Fear Of Music – but they needed an external catalyst to propel them further. In the case of Remain In Light, this was African polyrythyms, funk and electronics.
We can compare and contrast this with Radiohead. OK Computer, whilst coming from a different place and time, can perhaps be compared to Remain In Light, a guitar album with various textures and timbres of guitar. If we compare OK Computer, to Kid A, Iโll be saucy and vulgar and say it feels like Remain In Light, goes bleep techno. Of course, it isnโt solely electronic, but in terms of the โuniverseโ of sounds, the stance and attitude feels different. It feels bleepy not riffy. Kid A, reimagines what a rock band can be, pushing the perimeter of that outline with a combination of force and gentle persuasion. For contemporaries such as Bjรถrk and DJ Shadow, to name two examples, electronic music production techniques and attitudes were โpermittedโ – even respected, praised. For a rock band such as Radiohead, rockist tradition would not allow them to do so without the obligatory rock critic carping.
Where does the album sit now, this side of Brexit, coronavirus and Mumford and Sons?
In <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfkPmbg1ymM" target+"out">Reggie Wattโs funny yet affectionate impersonation of Radiohead, you can hear the Kid A-era sections as they crop up. That they fit into the overall continuity of the band, rather than jutting awkwardly out, demonstrates that with time, Kid A can be reconciled as part of the bandโs chronology, and not as some Metal Machine Music exception.
The legacy of Kid A has, if anything, improved over time. From a wobbly start it has since been heralded an album of that decade by publications such as Rolling Stone and The Times, a move which even Mark Beaumont later acknowledged he was in the minority holding his contemporary view, recognising that other people loved it, even if he didn’t.
Any number of average indie bands in their wake have cited the album as they have upped and moved sticks to Berlin, in order to โfindโ Steve Reich, Basic Channel and themselves. However, few of the acts Iโm thinking of did it with the depth of Radiohead – the acts just added interesting colours to ultimately average music.
Twenty years after the fact and Kid A now sounds warm, cosy, maybe even a bit traditional. It challenged what rock music could be, and now seems to happily exist as one of those albums, like Neu! 75, โHeroesโ and Tilt, that are touchstones for rock music; records that have popped expectation and become something new, something other. Itโs certainly an album I continue to enjoy listening to, even all these years later, but perhaps thatโs because I had open, rather than closed, ears when I listened to it the first time.
Even so, regardless of your own personal circumstances, itโs not impossible to try it again, even if it left you cold in 2000. When bananas were first imported into Britain, so the legend goes, kids would eat them with the skin on. They weren’t to know otherwise. If you approach Kid A as a new exotic banana, rather than expecting it to taste like an OK Computer apple, itโs not impossible youโll love it, if you know how to deal with the skin.